Didactic Feedback Cipher Long

Post Reply
W1zard
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:29 pm

Didactic Feedback Cipher Long

Post by W1zard »

Hey!
My solution is not excepted although I'm sure it's correct. I got the complete plain text so the answer should be ok, too. Would be nice if someone could check if there is a typo in the hex code.
therethinker
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:29 pm
Location: #hacker.org on Freenode

Post by therethinker »

The answer isn't hex. Once you find the plaintext, you should be able to go from there ;-)
W1zard
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:29 pm

Post by W1zard »

I know that the answer is not hex. As usual the answer something in English. I meant the hex which is given in the challenge. I checked the plain text twice now and everything fits quite nicely.
therethinker
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:29 pm
Location: #hacker.org on Freenode

Post by therethinker »

The entire plaintext isn't the answer either.
gfoot
Posts: 269
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2007 11:34 pm
Location: Brighton, UK

Post by gfoot »

I just checked, and the ciphertext on the page right now decrypts fine, and the answer it gives is accepted by the site.

Unlike some of these, I can't see any way you could get something which looks correct but is actually wrong. Hmm. If you want, you can PM me your answer - but I'm not sure whether I'll be able to say what you're doing wrong though.
W1zard
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:29 pm

Post by W1zard »

I know that, too! As in most of the other challenges the answer is not the complete text but just a part. In this case I got something like "xxxxxxxxx". So the answer should be xxxxxxxxx.
SirMouse
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 7:09 pm

Confused by "->"

Post by SirMouse »

I'm just not getting something in the code, the use of the Member by Pointer operator " -> " is confusing the hell out of me. Is it supposed to represent something else in the context of this code?
User avatar
m!nus
Posts: 202
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 6:49 pm
Location: Germany

Post by m!nus »

the 4 bytes from txt[x] to txt[x+3] get XORed
vielinko
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:48 pm

Post by vielinko »

m!nus wrote:the 4 bytes from txt[x] to txt[x+3] get XORed
Hello There,

Can you tell me how you know that

(txt -> txt[i + 3])

is the 4 bytes from txt[x] to txt[x+3] get XORed?

There is some standard about it?

I just have doubt about it :-P ...
________
Jaguar XJ13 history
Last edited by vielinko on Mon Jan 31, 2011 9:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
MerickOWA
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 5:54 pm
Location: HkRkoz al KuwaiT 2019 HaCkEr 101

Post by MerickOWA »

Yes " -> " means from txt[x] to txt[x+3] (4 bytes).

I know this because i've solved the problem and can verify thats what it means ;)
vielinko
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:48 pm

Post by vielinko »

ok, i just had the doubt :-P ... usually the "->" denote a pointer member from an object :) ...


But thank you for your replay :)
________
Ferrari 412T
aurquiel
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 8:02 pm

Post by aurquiel »

I have a i5 processor and just guessing the four bytes key with a c program of 50 lines is taking a couple of minutes
By brute force it takes around 3 min of program running.
Post Reply