White Or Black Hat?

Discussion about hacker.org's server

Which is Better? White Or Black Hat?

Black Hat!
14
29%
White Hat
34
71%
 
Total votes: 48

WhiteKnight
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:21 am

Post by WhiteKnight »

I'm a white hat hacker. Simply use hacking to defend my computer and my family computers.
User avatar
0.Dark.Thought
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:56 pm

Post by 0.Dark.Thought »

The_Dark_Avenger wrote:i'm probably gonna get flamed here, but i don't care
who's saying "cracking is not hacking" or "hackers never destroy anything" and so on, are just another lamers, who read some docs about hacking, and don't know much about it...
for real hacker there is no "good" or "bad", there is TRUE or FALSE - what makes sense, and what does not. And he does only and everything that is TRUE - if he needs to fuck up something, he cracks it, if he needs to create something - he creates it

damn right
Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance.
canine
Posts: 190
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 5:38 am

Post by canine »

0.Dark.Thought wrote:
The_Dark_Avenger wrote:i'm probably gonna get flamed here, but i don't care
who's saying "cracking is not hacking" or "hackers never destroy anything" and so on, are just another lamers, who read some docs about hacking, and don't know much about it...
for real hacker there is no "good" or "bad", there is TRUE or FALSE - what makes sense, and what does not. And he does only and everything that is TRUE - if he needs to fuck up something, he cracks it, if he needs to create something - he creates it

damn right
Nay. Cracking is an insult to the art.

Don't be a stupid tool. Create, don't destroy.
User avatar
0.Dark.Thought
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:56 pm

Post by 0.Dark.Thought »

canine wrote:
0.Dark.Thought wrote:
The_Dark_Avenger wrote:i'm probably gonna get flamed here, but i don't care
who's saying "cracking is not hacking" or "hackers never destroy anything" and so on, are just another lamers, who read some docs about hacking, and don't know much about it...
for real hacker there is no "good" or "bad", there is TRUE or FALSE - what makes sense, and what does not. And he does only and everything that is TRUE - if he needs to fuck up something, he cracks it, if he needs to create something - he creates it

damn right
Nay. Cracking is an insult to the art.

Don't be a stupid tool. Create, don't destroy.

and if a charity organization is secretly fowarding funds to themselves? thnk about it, robin hood STOLE from the richn and gave to the poor.

in the end destruction is sometimes the answer.

JUSTICE KNOWS NO LAWS
Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance.
canine
Posts: 190
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 5:38 am

Post by canine »

0.Dark.Thought wrote:
canine wrote:
0.Dark.Thought wrote:
damn right
Nay. Cracking is an insult to the art.

Don't be a stupid tool. Create, don't destroy.

and if a charity organization is secretly fowarding funds to themselves? thnk about it, robin hood STOLE from the richn and gave to the poor.

in the end destruction is sometimes the answer.

JUSTICE KNOWS NO LAWS
Bullshit.

Destruction is never acceptable; the legendary Robin Hood was a jackass. Maybe the poor deserved their predicament. Or maybe the rich actually deserved their wealth. Regardless, the legend implies that they possessed something, legally, and that he stole their funds and gave them to others.

That's fucked up.

If I have a dollar, and a man doesn't, it's not your place to liberate my dollar and give it to him. That's my dollar, damnit.

It's dishonest and shameful.
WhiteKnight
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:21 am

Post by WhiteKnight »

canine wrote:
0.Dark.Thought wrote:
canine wrote: Nay. Cracking is an insult to the art.

Don't be a stupid tool. Create, don't destroy.

and if a charity organization is secretly fowarding funds to themselves? thnk about it, robin hood STOLE from the richn and gave to the poor.

in the end destruction is sometimes the answer.

JUSTICE KNOWS NO LAWS
Bullshit.

Destruction is never acceptable; the legendary Robin Hood was a jackass. Maybe the poor deserved their predicament. Or maybe the rich actually deserved their wealth. Regardless, the legend implies that they possessed something, legally, and that he stole their funds and gave them to others.

That's fucked up.

If I have a dollar, and a man doesn't, it's not your place to liberate my dollar and give it to him. That's my dollar, damnit.

It's dishonest and shameful.
Agreed.

But what is interesting is that this website is more like a governmental structure of the goods and bads.

Think about it, it is that common.
Post Reply