Quinine
- Yharaskrik
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 11:44 am
- Location: Germany
I did 95 ... I had to prolong the copying code
to let it work
I almost matched tails solution ... ^0^p0^ was the critical save after which it becomed easy ...
93+ was my original encodding, but here there were other possibilities as well.
Stopping by 9 rather by 0 (when I used *g as the last cycle ...)
OK ... I hoped next level would be 94 ... so let us start big shortening effort
Oh ... simple $ was sufficient instead of these complicated addressing calculations ... blindness
I would never tought that would be that difficult to prolong the code by 1 op ... to match all the constraints
... what would be the 81 ... not really < used on 0 does the work, but there is another issue as well.
I am on 84, but the last step seems to be difficult again ...

Code: Select all
171486161628243475232857161337162976123239382473249473247613316079*^0^p0^5?88*c3+9*+P02^:53**g+

93+ was my original encodding, but here there were other possibilities as well.
Stopping by 9 rather by 0 (when I used *g as the last cycle ...)
OK ... I hoped next level would be 94 ... so let us start big shortening effort

Oh ... simple $ was sufficient instead of these complicated addressing calculations ... blindness

I would never tought that would be that difficult to prolong the code by 1 op ... to match all the constraints

I am on 84, but the last step seems to be difficult again ...