Challenge: Number Theory

honze
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 7:20 am
Location: Munich, Germany
Contact:

Challenge: Number Theory

Post by honze »

Hi there!

I looked closer at the number and got ... lets say 14 numbers.
It is obvious that there is a certain order of these numbers...

I ran a lot of tests, but nothing gave me a clue. Maybe someone could give me a little hint.
portal
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 4:36 am

Post by portal »

you are probably in the right track... but missing something about these numbers...
sorry, not very good in giving hints...
wodash1
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:22 pm

Post by wodash1 »

hi..
stabat
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 2:55 am
Location: Denmark

Post by stabat »

is the answer a number? a word?
this nice number drives me crazy :p
rmplpmpl
Posts: 113
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:38 am
Location: Germany

Post by rmplpmpl »

it's a word...
HugStuart
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:51 pm

Post by HugStuart »

I just solved it. This is one of these challenges that seems to be so easy after solving it :twisted:
User avatar
laz0r
Posts: 290
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:18 pm
Location: Within the depths of Unix

Post by laz0r »

Any help on extracting the numbers?
There is no spoon.
HugStuart
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:51 pm

Post by HugStuart »

The name says it all :wink:
User avatar
laz0r
Posts: 290
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:18 pm
Location: Within the depths of Unix

Post by laz0r »

Hmm, I managed to find the numbers, but now what? I've sorted them out correctly and tried a lot of logical things with them, but still unable to get anything meaningful out of it. Thanks
There is no spoon.
HugStuart
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 4:51 pm

Post by HugStuart »

You are really close...
User avatar
laz0r
Posts: 290
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:18 pm
Location: Within the depths of Unix

Post by laz0r »

Done =]

Thanks all
There is no spoon.
moose
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 7:32 pm

Post by moose »

You got 14 numbers? You're confusing me. I got 7 and most of them are quite big. The smallest one is 3. Am I on the right track?
satfreak666
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 8:37 am

Post by satfreak666 »

moose wrote:You got 14 numbers? You're confusing me. I got 7 and most of them are quite big. The smallest one is 3. Am I on the right track?
Guess not ... als least you got the wrong numbers ...
moose
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 7:32 pm

Post by moose »

I've got 104 ... I guess *** isn't the right way ;-)

edit ... oops ... just guessed you might talk about distinct numbers ... now I've also got 14


edit2: I don't get it. I tried modulo 26, but it didn't help. How are we supposed to convert them into a meaningful english word?
User avatar
laz0r
Posts: 290
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:18 pm
Location: Within the depths of Unix

Post by laz0r »

moose wrote:I've got 104 ... I guess *** isn't the right way ;-)

edit ... oops ... just guessed you might talk about distinct numbers ... now I've also got 14


edit2: I don't get it. I tried modulo 26, but it didn't help. How are we supposed to convert them into a meaningful english word?
Why those 14 numbers?

1. Determine what they all have in common
2. Understand why those 14 were picked and not any others that might share similar properties
3. Look closely and it might just strike you

It's actually a fairly simple challenge once you know how :D
There is no spoon.
Post Reply