hacker.org

Try to open:

Run -> cmb -> shutdown -a

This prevent the shutdown.

create a new shortcut.. then write;
shutdown -s -t 0 = this is for shut down in 0 seconds (t = time s=shutdown)
shutdown -r -t 0 = same but this is for restart comp. in 0 seconds..
(only for windows xp)
in win.98 this is different; we were wrote rundll32.exe -s or something like this..i couldnt remember right now..

anicoolrocks wrote:Try to open:

Run -> cmb -> shutdown -a

This prevent the shutdown.

create a new shortcut.. then write;
shutdown -s -t 0 = this is for shut down in 0 seconds (t = time s=shutdown)
shutdown -r -t 0 = same but this is for restart comp. in 0 seconds..
(only for windows xp)
in win.98 this is different; we were wrote rundll32.exe -s or something like this..i couldnt remember right now..

OK.
NO MORE BATCH SKIDS PLEASE.
Don't come in here telling people things that they knew since they were like 5.

anicoolrocks wrote:
Run -> cmb -> shutdown -a

WHATS CMB?!?!?

S3th wrote:

anicoolrocks wrote:
Run -> cmb -> shutdown -a

WHATS CMB?!?!?

LOL


How does I run batch virus in teh CMB?

PaRaDoX wrote:

anicoolrocks wrote:Try to open:

Run -> cmb -> shutdown -a

This prevent the shutdown.

create a new shortcut.. then write;
shutdown -s -t 0 = this is for shut down in 0 seconds (t = time s=shutdown)
shutdown -r -t 0 = same but this is for restart comp. in 0 seconds..
(only for windows xp)
in win.98 this is different; we were wrote rundll32.exe -s or something like this..i couldnt remember right now..

OK.
NO MORE BATCH SKIDS PLEASE.
Don't come in here telling people things that they knew since they were like 5.

Well... i learned something today... people are just getting more retarded.

namely you ^_^

How am I becoming more retarded by being a little pissed (just a bit) at kids who come in here all smug acting all '1337', thinking that knowing the most minuscule amount of batch makes them smarter than an entire forum. Even if it were true that this forum is a bunch of brain dead monkeys (not true for those who don't catch my verbose way of talking properly), that handful of monkeys could still come up with that super amazing command.

Even if this doesn't apply to this particular case, there are many that it does apply to, and quite frankly, I'm tired of it.

bravo ^_^

Zaffron wrote:bravo ^_^

Sorry, I was angry :3

BTW I wasn't calling you retarded if thats what you thought >.<

PaRaDoX wrote:How am I becoming more retarded by being a little pissed (just a bit) at kids who come in here all smug acting all '1337', thinking that knowing the most minuscule amount of batch makes them smarter than an entire forum. Even if it were true that this forum is a bunch of brain dead monkeys (not true for those who don't catch my verbose way of talking properly), that handful of monkeys could still come up with that super amazing command.

Even if this doesn't apply to this particular case, there are many that it does apply to, and quite frankly, I'm tired of it.

The "people are getting more retarded thing wasn't aimed against you" but sure, now it can be :p
And btw i couldn't stop laughing at your text xD

kk for the record i said liidian is retarded, not PaRa

Liidian wrote:

PaRaDoX wrote:How am I becoming more retarded by being a little pissed (just a bit) at kids who come in here all smug acting all '1337', thinking that knowing the most minuscule amount of batch makes them smarter than an entire forum. Even if it were true that this forum is a bunch of brain dead monkeys (not true for those who don't catch my verbose way of talking properly), that handful of monkeys could still come up with that super amazing command.

Even if this doesn't apply to this particular case, there are many that it does apply to, and quite frankly, I'm tired of it.

The "people are getting more retarded thing wasn't aimed against you" but sure, now it can be :p
And btw i couldn't stop laughing at your text xD

What was so funny about it? (aside form the obvious).

I would love to hear your humble opinion.

And also, what I said just so happens to be true. If you think I'm retarded, I think that you can't read properly, and don't understand half of what I said.

S3th wrote:

anicoolrocks wrote:
Run -> cmb -> shutdown -a

WHATS CMB?!?!?

okey i stand corrected ie CMD ---> command prompt . u think others are pump"in shit nd u r not ,but things r not the way u think my frnd

Liidian wrote:

PaRaDoX wrote:

anicoolrocks wrote:Try to open:

Run -> cmb -> shutdown -a

This prevent the shutdown.

create a new shortcut.. then write;
shutdown -s -t 0 = this is for shut down in 0 seconds (t = time s=shutdown)
shutdown -r -t 0 = same but this is for restart comp. in 0 seconds..
(only for windows xp)
in win.98 this is different; we were wrote rundll32.exe -s or something like this..i couldnt remember right now..

OK.
NO MORE BATCH SKIDS PLEASE.
Don't come in here telling people things that they knew since they were like 5.

Well... i learned something today... people are just getting more retarded.

nd u r also one of them in the flock of ppl