Page 2 of 2

Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 3:32 pm
by sabretooth
Really really liked this one. Definitely made me think :)

No bruteforce needed indeed :D

sabretooth

Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 12:38 pm
by aurora
indeed ... no brute-force needed. the solution was quite insightful for me. interesting challange ...

Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:23 am
by bboy
I had WFT moment after solving this crypto. Really interesting :D.

Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 2:26 pm
by AgRaven
Haha, I've been using these crypto chalanges as motivation and goal setting for learning my way through c++ . I spent some time on this one thinking the wrong way, and the output my code gave me (as a modified version of other programs I wrote for cyphers) just underlined that mistake.... made me laugh. :D

Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2013 8:48 pm
by marko9900
IT seems like im trying to brute force it :D I wrote a simple code in python, that gives me all 256 possibilities. Only thing missing is to convet alla those int oASCII.

Any guidance for me?

Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 11:11 am
by TheBigBoss
marko9900 wrote:Any guidance for me?
Surely you're joking... :roll:

Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 3:48 pm
by aurquiel
In this code

Code: Select all

k = {unknown byte}
for (i = 0; i < len(txt); i++)
  c = txt[i] ^ k
  print c
  k = c
This

Code: Select all

k = c


should be this

Code: Select all

k = txt[i]

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2018 6:41 pm
by Miyazawa
aurquiel wrote:In this code

Code: Select all

k = {unknown byte}
for (i = 0; i < len(txt); i++)
  c = txt[i] ^ k
  print c
  k = c
This

Code: Select all

k = c


should be this

Code: Select all

k = txt[i]
It is true! Thank you @aurquiel.
The algorithm is wrong so I have wasted a lot of time by doing this challange...
You should correct this...

Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2018 6:19 am
by Hippo
Miyazawa wrote:
aurquiel wrote:In this code

Code: Select all

k = {unknown byte}
for (i = 0; i < len(txt); i++)
  c = txt[i] ^ k
  print c
  k = c
This

Code: Select all

k = c


should be this

Code: Select all

k = txt[i]
It is true! Thank you @aurquiel.
The algorithm is wrong so I have wasted a lot of time by doing this challange...
You should correct this...
I don't think there is problem with the challenge.
What "a lot of time" roughly means in SI units?
Never mind, you have already solved the puzzle.