Hmmmm.....
...some machine's opcodes?
...Java bytecode?
...some other programming language's virtual machine bytecode?
.....hmmmm.....
My Instructions
-
- Forum Admin
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 9:14 am
- Location: Germany
- dangermouse
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:14 pm
- Location: deep space computing AG
- Contact:
I've been looking at this for ages and haven't got a clue.
My first hunch was binary for some architecture, ARM seems to fit, but the all the refernce manuals I found are 404ing, so i hope that's not it.
As for the Road runner comment, that really has me confused, beep codes would suggest it's a BIOS fragment to me, Meep Code is something about computing modells of metals.
My first hunch was binary for some architecture, ARM seems to fit, but the all the refernce manuals I found are 404ing, so i hope that's not it.
As for the Road runner comment, that really has me confused, beep codes would suggest it's a BIOS fragment to me, Meep Code is something about computing modells of metals.
-
- Forum Admin
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Sat May 28, 2011 9:14 am
- Location: Germany
Thanks, i guess that helps me. The pronounciation is pretty far out even for a German.
I considered this possibility before, but i let myself get confused by the first instruction. Its type wasn't insensible in itself, i just didn't expect it there, but now i translated it fully and it falls together. Thanks a lot.
I considered this possibility before, but i let myself get confused by the first instruction. Its type wasn't insensible in itself, i just didn't expect it there, but now i translated it fully and it falls together. Thanks a lot.
I'm having trouble with this challenge.
I'm pretty sure what architecture it is. If I replace the unknown values (8 of them) with NOPs and the branch addresses with labels, I get a chunk of text showing that I'm very far off something like "Thank your for solving". However, most of the message is garbled. I was able to reconstruct the quote by fixing a few values in the code, but for the second half I have no idea and the "the answer is" part is ambiguous (multiple fixes can lead to this part).
Am I even supposed to go this far? Or should I have seen the answer text right away?
I'm pretty sure what architecture it is. If I replace the unknown values (8 of them) with NOPs and the branch addresses with labels, I get a chunk of text showing that I'm very far off something like "Thank your for solving". However, most of the message is garbled. I was able to reconstruct the quote by fixing a few values in the code, but for the second half I have no idea and the "the answer is" part is ambiguous (multiple fixes can lead to this part).
Am I even supposed to go this far? Or should I have seen the answer text right away?